AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Muditts loses 0-licence, and receives five-year ban

3rd April 2003, Page 6
3rd April 2003
Page 6
Page 6, 3rd April 2003 — Muditts loses 0-licence, and receives five-year ban
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Tachograph, Simm

by Michael Jewell and Chris Tindall Murfitts Transport, part of haulage giant Norfolk Line, has lost its 254-vehicle Operator's Licence and has been disqualified from obtaining a licence in any traffic area for five years.

The East Anglian haulier lost its licence following a Cambridge disciplinary inquiry in front of the Eastern Traffic Commissioner Geoffrey Simms. The hearing followed the conviction last year of 131 of Murfitts' drivers, one-third of its workforce in the Eastern Area, for a series of drivers hours offences including the falsification of tachograph records.

The TC was told that the Vehicle Inspectorate had also found vehicles that had not had two and six-yearly tachograph calibration checks, two vehicles with defective tachographs, 32 vehicles with speed limiter problems, the use of unauthorised operating centres at Tilbury and Thurrock, and the use of 13 vehicles after their excise licences had been surrendered (ChM Jan-5 Feb41.6-12 Feb).

In his decision, Simms says that it is quite frightening that a very large and long-established operator had no idea whether its drivers were obeying the law. It demonstrated a reckless disregard by both management and drivers to a very important road safety consideration. Management control had collapsed completely he says, adding: The new owners, Norfolk Line, are anxious to continue to operate Murfitts Transport under its established identity.

"That surprises me, because their relationship with this company casts a cloud over their own reputation, which had previously been beyond reproach."

The system by which the drivers' hours rules were monitored had completely collapsed. Norfolk Line appointed their own director to the board, Diederick Blom, and because of their reservations Introduced further elements into the system, But Simms says neither Mark Murrill nor Blom took sufficient interest in monitoring this.

"This company, which had at its disposal the means to operate in a satisfactory manner, has conducted its transport operations in a quite disgraceful manner," says Simms.

He had no power to disqualify former directors, but warned Murfitt and Blom that their repute was unlikely to be restored for five years. However, he held that Norfolk Line had not lost its repute, and granted its application to add 45 vehicles and 65 trailers to its licence, together with two operating centres at Whittlesey. Simms said he was satisfied that the systems adopted were sufficiently robust.

Norfolk Line group MD Derek Sloane says it is quite possible that redundancies will be made, but this was always a possibility. "We accept the responsibility," he says. "It's unfortunate for all the people who have put in so much effort. We have taken due steps, and we believe we have got the company on the right footing."

• christopher.tindall@rbi.co.uk


comments powered by Disqus