AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Volvo F10

31st December 1983
Page 39
Page 39, 31st December 1983 — Volvo F10
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Just as we were beginning to think that Volvo had gone to ground, we were able in November to publish a report on the slimmer and fitter F10.

The 4x2 tractive unit with day cab weighed in at 6.5 tonnes and still maintained Volvo's traditionally high standard of driver comfort.

Gear changing with the positive and light electro-pneumatic range-change box was very smooth and the improved noise sealing around the lever.

Over the three days of the operational trial the weather might have been kinder. As it was, it rained for much of each day's running. Fuel consumption was further impaired by a faulty thermostat so that, overall, the F10 returned a disappointing 41.79Iit/ 100km (6.76mpg) with Volvo's latest turbocharged and air to air charge-cooled 9.6-litre engine.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus