AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

VED case dropped over trailer test

30th July 1998, Page 22
30th July 1998
Page 22
Page 22, 30th July 1998 — VED case dropped over trailer test
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A charge that FM Engineering had used a vehicle when the wrong rate of VED had been paid was dropped after the prosecution accepted that the law governing the hauling of empty trailers had changec. The trailer manufacturer had denied the offence before the Leigh, Lancs magistrates. It arose when a tractor was used to take an unladen semi-trailer for annual test. It had been suggested the tractor should have been taxed at the rate For a 38-tonner rather than 2160 for special vehicles.

Prosecuting, Alan Bakkar said the case had been brought in line with the High Court's decision in Booth vs DPP. However, it had been pointed out by defence solicitor James Backhouse that the 1994 Vehicles Excise and Registration Act had been amended by the 1996 Finance Act. This included a new definition of "special vehicle".

AA

Tags

Organisations: High Court

comments powered by Disqus