1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188 
gagilugam Clearly, all these systems are very effective in what
Page 61
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
they do. But just how necessary they all are remains to be seen. CMbelieves ESP should be moved from the options list to the standard specification. Such a capable and active safety system. and one that makes a valid contribution to operational safety. should not be used to prise yet more money from operators wallets.
As for adaptive cruise control and lane monitoring systems, well, were less convinced of their value — particularly in an industry that is led by high levels of driver training and professionalism. Electronic systems that take too much responsibility from a driver could lead to lapses in concentration and increases in boredom, which in turn can cause unnecessary risk-taking, as these systems. and others like them, become far too easily relied upon.