1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160 
A CCESS to premises, profits, Common Market removals and 1963 rating
Page 111
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
valuation were some of the subjects discussed at the autumn conference of the National Association of Furniture Warehousemen and Removers held in London last week.
In the opening session Mr. F. W. H. Winwood submitted a progress report on 'Access to Blocks of Flats and Offices." appreciate had been overlooked. Modern metal casements could not be taken out like the old-style wooden-frame windows and expensive 70 ft. hoists, though eminently suitable for large furniture, had obvious disadvantages where the whole contents of a flat were concerned.
Removers' profitability was then discussed by Mr. G. E. Pearson, chairman of the Development Committee on the guidance and should further studies be made, he suggested that standard skeleton account forms might be devised to ensure uniformity of approach. Several members questioned the validity of the revenue figure of £1,000 per employee and whilst Mr. Pearson himself was not satisfied, variations in completion of the forms might be a partial explanation.
The extent to which members of