AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

MT looks at exemption of seatbelts for deliveries

28th August 2003, Page 11
28th August 2003
Page 11
Page 11, 28th August 2003 — MT looks at exemption of seatbelts for deliveries
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• The Department for Transport ( DfT) is proposing a clampdown on drivers who avoid wearing seatbelts while making frequent local deliveries or collections. It is launching a consultation into how far drivers can travel between drops without having to wear a seatbelt.

The current seatbelt wearing rate for van drivers is around 63% and 55% for their passengers, compared with 90% and 92% respectively for car occupants. In vans, up to 21 fatalities and 241 serious casualties each year could be prevented if belts were worn, according to the Transport Research Laboratory which conducted research on the DfT's behalf.

Currently, the law allows exemption for such work but gives no definition of what distance between stoppages constitutes a "local round".

Many van and goods vehicle drivers believe there is a general trade exemption, which applies to any delivery over any distance. The law allows exemption only when "delivering or collecting mail or goods on local rounds in a vehicle constructed or adapted for that purpose".

Gavin Scott, regional policy manager for the FTA, says: "We believe the distance allowed should be as short as possible. If the new law saves lives, then it can only be a good thing."

The DfT will consider all responses.

Tags

Organisations: Department for Transport
People: Gavin Scott