AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

No Decision on Spelmonden

27th March 1964, Page 28
27th March 1964
Page 28
Page 28, 27th March 1964 — No Decision on Spelmonden
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AS reported briefly in last week's issue of The Commercial Motor, the Transport Tribunal reserved its decision on the appeal by Spelmonden Estate Co. Ltd., of Goudhurst, Kent, against the South Eastern Licensing Authority's refusal to grant an application for four vehicles on A licence.

Counsel for Spelmonden, Mr. J. R. C. Samuel Gibbon, claimed that the Authority had been misled at the lower hearing by the objectors, British Railways and British Road Services. In reply, Mr. R. M. Yorke, for B.R.S., challenged a written agreement between Spelmonden and Henry W. Arnold, fruit wholesalers of Spitalfields Market, London. The agreement, which contained a "priority clause ", allowed Spelmonden to carry other customers' goods during the slack fruit season provided Arnold's goods were given priority.

Mr. Yorke claimed that Spelmondert was attempting to get the best of both worlds" and the arrangement was, in effect, indistinguishable from C hiring. The applicant would be able to compete with other hauliers for other traffic for which there had been no evidence of need.

If this application be right ", said Mr. Yorke, "it really is the end of Contract A licences. What the applicants want are all the advantages of Contract A without the disadvantages of having to enter into a minimum payment clause and not being able to earn a bit more jam for their bread and butter when the vehicles are doing nothing."


comments powered by Disqus