1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182 
Myers attitudes ire still at fault
Page 26
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
VHILE I AGREE with many of )ave Young's concerns and ideas rith regards to the creation and dministration of the driver's "PC, he appears to be missing iy main point.
The sad truth of the matter is at it doesn't matter how much me, effort and thought is put into xactly what the training is to iclude, and how it is assessed — le vast majority of drivers will bject and dismiss it as irrelevant ithout bothering to check their ids in the first place.
You could be teaching them landarin Chinese for all they care... they simply want no part of it, in any form.
Of course I'm glad Mr Young respects us as much as he obviously does, hut sadly there are times when that respect is unjustified, and God forbid anyone should actually ask a driver to prove his skills or worth. It is precisely this reluctance to engage with the initiative that will lead to pen-pushers deciding the detail —many drivers are interested only in moaning about the state of the stable door after the horse has bolted.As usual.
L Hadley Bye-mail