AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

TRAILER AERODYNAMICS

25th September 2008
Page 12
Page 12, 25th September 2008 — TRAILER AERODYNAMICS
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

'Teardrop' trailers thrown into doubt by MIRA study

THE FUEL-EFFICIENCY gains of a so-called 'teardrop' trailer are no better than those of a 4.1m-high trailer, says one trailer manufacturer.

The research, by automotive institute MIRA on behalf of Lawrence David, tested a variety of trailer styles and designs by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling techniques and found that compared with a standard 4.5m trailer with optimised cab deflector, a teardrop trailer saved 5.1% almost the same as a 4.1m trailer. The teardrop trailer will impact on fuel, but it also impacts on load volume," says Lawrence David technical director Brian Timpson. "Clearly, if you can't use the space in the teardrop, which can be difficult to fill operationally, then you are better off with a standard 4.1m curtainsider and just avoid the problems of low bridges.

"Operators have to consider what benefits these new trailer types bring."

• For more on the MIRA research, turn to page 42.