AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Competition Allowed by 1930 Act

25th March 1960, Page 43
25th March 1960
Page 43
Page 43, 25th March 1960 — Competition Allowed by 1930 Act
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE Road Traffic Act, 1930, did not state that there should be no competition between operators, said Mr.

A. T. Hanlon, chairman, Northern Traffic Commissioners, at Stockton-onTees on Tuesday.

He was giving the Commissioners' decision to grant additional journeys on an express licence between Norton-onTees and the works of Imperial Chemical Industries, Ltd., Wilton, to Bee Line Roadways (Tees-side), Ltd.

Mr. Hanlon said that the objectors, Tees-side RaiHess Traction Board, Middlesbrough Corporation and United Automobile Services, Ltd., claimed that there would be abstraction. The question was, he said: "Does this constitute wasteful competition?" The duties of the Commissioners were to prevent this, added Mr. Hanlon, and he justified the grant by saying that the application had features which distinguished it from the well-accepted principles.

The service had been operated for a number of years and employees at Wilton had increased from 2.500, in 1951, to 10,500, in 1959. I.C.I. were concerned at the increase of workers using private cars to get to worlc One witness, a shift worker at Wilton, said that he would stop working at such an inaccessible place if he had to make two or three changes of bus to get there.

Additional picking-up -points, which were sought in Middlesbrough, were refused.

Tags

People: A. T. Hanlon