AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Not liable

21st January 1984
Page 7
Page 7, 21st January 1984 — Not liable
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AULIERS are unlikely to b late in the event of hijac ch as those last we ccording to the Freight ansport Association, While the MIR insuran nvention sets out the max urn limit which can .med against the haul r loss of goods in norm

rtumstances, the FTA yes that there is a releva cape clause.

It says a court may decid at, if through circurn antes which the carr uld not avoid and the co quences of which he ca prevent, there may be ad defence against liabi The FTA is advising i embers that cargo owner ould seek comperisatio rough the French cou am the perpetrators of th *me. In this case, it will a oath the French Gayer ant.

The MIR cover, up to t it of the value of the co gnment, is 8.33 sped awing rights per kg. T nsignor can claim for th lue of the goads an ansport cost

Tags