No o-m-o bonus for 2-man job
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• An industrial court has dimissee claim by the General and Munici Workers' Union that the Economic Bus 4 South Shields, which does not opeg one-man buses, should nevertheless drivers o-m-o bonuses. The union argi that members had approved in principle drive one-man buses. Other companies w using services of this kind, and Economic Bus Co was under an obligat to pay the same wages as other operators
The union said that by not paying bonus, the firm was underpaying employ by about 15s a week; the firm would o be entitled to withhold bonuses if its driv had not been willing to adopt one-n operation.
For the company, it was stated it wo not be able to run its services efficiently g punctually with o-m-o; as it did not intl starting one-man services, it had not mi any agreement on the matter with the urn The court decided that the firm had contravened the regulations dealing vi comparability of wages between rg service employees.