1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182 
Dispute over road-to-water consultation
Page 21
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
The government stands accused of watering down proposals to shift bulk freight by water rather than road. Chris Tindall reports.
WA' l'E R -F REI G HT operators have condemned what they claim is a watering down of the government's policy to move large,abnormal freight loads by canal in favour of using road haulage.
Canal lobby group the Inland Waterways Association (IWA) says a recent Highways Agency (HA) consultation to clarify the'water preferred' guidelines contradicts the government's environmental priorities.It is concerned that the government is attempting to move away from favouring water freight "by stealth" if the cost mounts up.
The Freight Transport Association (FTA) disagrees, saying any move to increase road congestion would not be not in the HA's interests. The consultation asked interested parties if it is appropriate to allow a road move if the costs of travelling by water exceeds 20% of the value of the load. It also asks if the threshold applied should vary according to mileage difference between road and water.
The Commercial Boat Operators' Association (CBOA) says this is evidence that the criterion for permitting the use of roads is being relaxed. It claims the government would show preference for road haulage even if the cost is also more than 20% of the load value.
CBOA chairman John Dodwell says: "Slow-moving, long articulated lorries taking up more than half the road width cause significant delay and frustration to motorists; this is unnecessary when an alternative already exists. We shall ask for a meeting with government officials to expand on our views."
FTA regional policy manager James Firth says the HA's criteria is not clear and he questions the costs, hut adds:"! don't think you can argue the government is trying to encourage freight on to roads."
A Department for Transport spokesman comments: "The consultation is not intended to review the water preferred policy. Rather, it is aimed at clarifying how the policy is applied, and providing greater transparency of the whole. decision-making process."