AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

NON-ATTENDANCE RECORD • N ONE of the four applicants in the

19th May 1967, Page 32
19th May 1967
Page 32
Page 32, 19th May 1967 — NON-ATTENDANCE RECORD • N ONE of the four applicants in the
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

list put in an appearance at Wednesday's public enquiry in the Metropolitan traffic area, although a large number of objectors attended and were represented.

LA Mr. D. 1. R. Muir, dismissing the applications for lack of prosecution, said: "This constitutes a record for non-attendance.

"The objectors have been put to trouble, expense and inconvenience which could have been avoided if the applicants had had the decency to inform this office in reasonable time that they did not intend to proceed."

There was nothing he could do to compensate the objectors. He hoped, however, that the names of the applicants would be published in the trade papers.

They are: Lionel Arthur Hayden, 44 Thaxted Road, Buckhurst Hill, Essex. John Edward Tatton, 1 Wyncham Avenue, Sidcup, Kent. Alfred William Reid, 7 Queen Street, Romford, Essex. David Tobin, 93 Beddington Lane, Croydon, Surrey.


comments powered by Disqus