AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

DAMAGE TO ROADS: LIABILITY FOR COMPENSATION

18th October 1946
Page 28
Page 28, 18th October 1946 — DAMAGE TO ROADS: LIABILITY FOR COMPENSATION
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

ADECISION of interest to haulage contractors has been reported to the highways committee of Ross-shire County Council. The council brought an action against Messrs. Munro Brothers, rreillowners, Conon Bridge, and the case has been settled by the defendants agreeing to pay the council £40 damages, together with expenses of the court proceedings.

The case arose from the defendants causing damage to the roads in the county by the use of a traction engine, the wheels of which were fitted with spuds. The defendants contended that they were not liable for damages, on the ground that any liability was confined to a penalty for a breach of the Road Traffic Act, 1930, and that no civil liability attached to them through their illegal use of their traction engine.

The Sheriff-substitute and the Sheriff Principal did not agree.

Tags

Organisations: Ross-shire County Council

comments powered by Disqus