AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Plating and testing tines

18th July 1969, Page 40
18th July 1969
Page 40
Page 40, 18th July 1969 — Plating and testing tines
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Mr. L. Hill, of Leeds, was fined £20 by Leeds City magistrates on Monday for failing to have his vehicle plated and tested. The defendant, who pleaded guilty, was ordered to pay a fine of £10 on both Sections 14(1) and 14(2) of the Road Safety Act 1967. Mr. Hill's vehicle should have been plated and tested before February 1 1969.

At Dewsbury Borough magistrates' court on Tuesday, Moulson Plant Hire Ltd., of Bradford, was fined £5 on Section 14(1) and £5 on Section 14(2) of the Road Safety Act 1967. The company was also ordered to pay a fine of E2 for failing to display an identity certificate, and lOs cost.

Mr. J. L. Sugden, of Ossett, also appearing at Dewsbury magistrates' court on Tuesday, was ordered to pay a total of £20 for contravening the plating and testing regulation. He was charged in respect of two dates and was fined £5 on both Sections 14(1) and 14(2) of the Road Safety Act 1967 for each of the two days.

Tags

Locations: Bradford, Leeds City, Leeds