AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

" R.H.E. Squeeze" Allegation

18th January 1952
Page 29
Page 29, 18th January 1952 — " R.H.E. Squeeze" Allegation
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE Road HaulageExeCutive have got to squeeze and squeeze until the long;clistanee operators 'are out of business." It was alleged that these words were used by an official of the R.H.E. when .a private haulier went to a local office of the Executiveto cornplain about the refusal to grant a longdistance permit. • The haulier, Mr. Rowherry, formed his business into a limited-liability company shortly after the Transport Act came into force. The business was held to be a completely new undertaking and a permit was refused. Last week, the company, Clement Garage (Birmingham), Ltd., Clement Street, Birmingham, was fined £10 on each of eight summonses, and ordered to pay £5 5s. costs, for operating beyond the 25-mile limit.

The magistrate "was -fold that the refusal to grant a-permit had robbed the company of 49 per •cent. of its work. Mr. K. Mynett, for the defence, said that the offences were a direct result of The " inexplicable " refusal of the RILE. to giant permits to the concern, when' it was proper that this:

should have been done. • He said that the journeys beyond the limit had been undertaken to oblige a customer of 23 years' standing, who wanted some special apparatus taken to the north for the Ministry of Works,

Tags

Organisations: Ministry of Works
People: Rowherry, K. Mynett
Locations: Birmingham

comments powered by Disqus