1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 
:Only of the people
Page 19
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
ECEiNISING AUTHORITIES were required to pay particular tentrn to drivers of heavy goods vehicles who were likely to !co e a danger to the public; and they also had to take into ;co nt the opinion of the general public in relation to such !Ilk es.
This was said by the NorlerrtiLicensing Authority, m Foster, at Newcastlepon-Tvne on November 6 hen he turned down an veal by T. F. Cousins of St swald Court, Felling, against decision refusing to renew is hgv driving licence.
The refusal had been based n his record of convictions, icluding two for drinking and rivihg and two for driving while disqualified. Mr Cousins had been disqualified for a total period of four and a half years.
J. Foley, for Mr Cousins, pointed out that when he last appeared before the Magistrates on Max' 11, they decided on hardship grounds not to disqualify him further as this would prevent him from following his occupation.