AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

LHVs would require added responsibilities EC report

16th September 2010
Page 12
Page 12, 16th September 2010 — LHVs would require added responsibilities EC report
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

,shris.tindatIRrhi.co.uk IF LONGER, heavier vehicles (LHVs) were allowed on UK roads the chain of responsibility over their compliance might have to be extended to shippers and receivers, according to a study prepared for the European Commission (EC).

The inception report reviews various policy options open to the EC if it decides to alter the regulations for heavy weights and dimensions in all member states.

Changing the regulations is technically complex and difficult, states the report, adding that it is "exacerbated by the sensitive and emotive nature of the debate amongst a variety of different interest groups".

Changes would reflect developments in member states where LHVs are being operated, although their use has been rejected by the UK government.

However, the report says any permission to use them must be allied to risk mitigation strategies to ensure safe operation and public acceptance.

It continues: "A number of polides, techniques and technologies have been developed, or are under development, that could potentially help improve this, for exam

pie extending the chain of responsibility for compliance to shippers and receivers."

But the Freight Transport Association warns that this could represent a step backwards: "The current system, whereby the responsibility for the roadworthiness of the vehicle lies with the operator, is the most effective and proven way of enforcing overloading offences," says James Firth, head of road freight and enforcement policy

-Even if LHVs were permitted, there is no reason why this should be changed; indeed, absolving the operator from responsibility could be a retrograde step for road safety."