AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

our firm caught out y the missing words

15th June 1979, Page 23
15th June 1979
Page 23
Page 23, 15th June 1979 — our firm caught out y the missing words
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

ACH FIRM was caught out when it left off two words from ficial application for new British tours.

• the two extra words led "per tour" — and the Ing firms were quick to out that this meant the Cotters Tours, Glasgow, I only be permitted to run 'dm coach on its fleet for • oposed new tours, on the of the application ;hed in Notices and Prongs.

tters sought to operate tours varying from five elve days' duration in adto the eleven tours cur1 operated from Glasgow he nine from Edinburgh. e existing programme sts mostly of Continental but it does include a tour a Scottish Highlands and o Blackpool. The applicawas in response to deIs from Cotters' existing )mers for a wider selec)f British tours.

e proposals were opposed V. Alexander and Sons land) Ltd, Scottish .ibuses Ltd, Highland Omnibuses Ltd, Keil Coaches, Wallis Arnold Tours Ltd, and Parks of Hamilton Ltd.

The Scottish Traffic Commissioners heard J. B. T. Louden, for the three Scottish Bus Group companies, argue that the words "maximum number of vehicles one" in the published application meant that the company might only operate one extra coach per year on the additional tours.

For Cotters, it was said that the company's application had read "One vehicle per tour" but the words "per tour" had been missed from the official publication.

Cotters withdrew its application after hearing that the application would require re-publication before the Traffic Commissioners would be prepared to deal with it, and said it would submit a new application immediately.

Tags

People: Keil Coaches
Locations: Glasgow, Edinburgh