AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Absence of Hazchem training cost £1,250

15th August 1991, Page 15
15th August 1991
Page 15
Page 15, 15th August 1991 — Absence of Hazchem training cost £1,250
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

II A York operator who was said to be unable to find time to train his drivers to carry dangerous chemicals has been ordered to pay £1,250 in fines and costs.

Peter France of Fulford admitted carrying drums of cyclo hexlamine in a vehicle without a fire extinguisher and with an untrained driver.

Prosecuting for the Health & Safety Executive, Keith King said that cyclo hexlamine was a flammable and corrosive substance that gave off toxic fumes. The drums of the chemical were being carried on behalf of Cargo Fleet Chemicals of Teesside.

France had been carrying for that company for 10 years. In 1988 he had signed an undertaking to comply with all the requirements of the Haichempak regulations, required by Cargo Fleet in pursuance of BS5750.

Cargo Fleet had indicated that France had been concerned about the cost of training his drivers.

Tags

People: Keith King