AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Training fiasco your article conceitning the disastrous news regarding the

14th May 1998, Page 37
14th May 1998
Page 37
Page 37, 14th May 1998 — Training fiasco your article conceitning the disastrous news regarding the
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

RTITB's financial collapse, though hardly unexpected, is a matter on which I would like to comment (CM 30 April-6 May).

If joint administrator Hunter Kelly has been reported correctly, the industry can expect real problems in salvaging anything from the RTITB.

The "charitable donations" to which he refers are, I imagine, that company's obligations to fund the road transport and garage industry's Standards Councils from RTITB assets. These assets were rightfully the property of the road transport industry under the levy/grant system.

Agreeing to fund these councils was one of the conditions agreed with the then Secretary of State and industry representatives for allowing the old RTITB to remain in existence, to retain industry money and become a training trading company with charitable status.

It was certainly no act of charity on the part of the RTITB to fund these councils; it was part of an unfortunate arrangement made as a result of the demise of the training board system.

As a founder but now retired director of the RHDTC—and one of the minority who opposed this system of funding and forecast its failure at that time— I take no satisfaction in being proved right.

We now need a public inquiry into the fiasco of the RTITB's conduct, and the industry needs to make arrangements to fund the RHDTC, without which we have no national road transport training organisation.

J Coates, Glenfield, Leicester