AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

P LETTER OF THE WEEK

13th November 2008
Page 20
Page 20, 13th November 2008 — P LETTER OF THE WEEK
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

LHVs back on the agenda... good

AT LAST, THE Department for Transport (DfT) seems to have seen the light and put longer trucks back on its agenda for British roads (CM, 23 October). On an island this size, the argument for longer combinations is clear but disorganised.

It would mean less road traffic, and with many operations based on central motorway networks, it could be easily managed. I would impose some operational restrictions, though. Keep them at 50mph in order to keep fuel economy up, keep them to the inside lanes and keep them on motorway and duel carriageways only.

Make sure drivers have a specialised additional licence to drive them, and make sure they run at specific times. i.e during the evenings, when the bulk of trunking is done.

The DfT needs to look to Holland for its impact and give British trailer manufacturers a chance to get involved in building the type of solutions needed by the British haulier. I am all for improving the British road network, and longer trucks is one way of doing it.

The lobby for longer trucks needs a cohesive argument that has not been apparent. Hauliers and associations have been arguing for it from different hill tops, now they need to join and use this green light to apply unified pressure.

Unfortunately, the rail lobby has the ear of the DtT, and if a trial ever gets off the ground, it would be a miracle.

Name and address withheld

Tags

Organisations: Department for Transport