1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164 
lungs which only look like msconduct
Page 26
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
'our employee does a particular route to nd from one of your customers, a hemical works. Smoking is forbidden at he chemical works, and a security guard
t the works reports that your employee 3 seen with a forbidden fag.
The chemical company bans your iriver. You do not believe a word of it ,ut, despite your pleas to the customer, the prohibition stands. Since you do not believe the employee is guilty of misconduct, you cannot dismiss him for misconduct. But you have no other work for this person: your drivers are based in different geographical areas, no-one will swap and no other arrangement is feasible. The employee is not redundant because there is still a need for a driver,
However, there is still a potentially fair reason for dismissal—this is "some other substantial reason". This includes any reason which is not arbitrary, does not fall into any of the other categories, but which represents a sound and sensible business reason.