AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Call for changes in EEC lights regs

13th April 1979, Page 7
13th April 1979
Page 7
Page 7, 13th April 1979 — Call for changes in EEC lights regs
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE FREIGHT Transport Association has called for modifications in goods vehicle rear lighting legislation and for amendments to EEC legislation, which could apply in the UK.

The initiative follows publication of the FTA's Vehicle Lighting Working 3arty report which states that "the )roliferation of lights and reflectors low required or permitted is neither otally effective nor readily understood )3/ other road users."

The FTA recommendations include he fitting of additional rear lights, :nown as outline markers, in line with tormal rear lamps rather than at the Lighest practical point called for in an :EC requirement not yet adopted in the JK. It further recommends that all vehicles should be fitted with rear reflectors to EEC standards to ensure visibility in the event of lamp failure. Vehicles with trailers or semi-trailers should display modified rear reflective marker boards showing total length to the nearest metre. Triangular reflectors on such vehicles should be dropped, as they are not widely understood, says the report.

Matched pairs rather than single high-intensity rear lights should be mandatory and reversing lights should be optional.

The working party believes that the lighting configurations it suggests will make obvious to other road users the presence and characteristics of heavy goods vehicles travelling in the dark.

Tags