AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Ferrymasters have to wait

12th September 1969
Page 71
Page 71, 12th September 1969 — Ferrymasters have to wait
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Ferrymasters Ltd. will have to wait for the decision on its A licence application for eight arts, completed in Preston last week. The case was heard by the North Western deputy LA. Mr. A. H. Jolliffe, and was a continued hearing (CM June 27). There were eight objectors.

Mr. J. van Schijndel, director of Ferrymasters Holland N.V., explained that in a "Continent—Ireland" service his company would collect the complete payment and pay Ferrymastqs Ltd. for the British haul. As he was responsible for the complete journey he did not like to use subcontractors.

The operations manager of Ferrymasters Ltd., Mr. R. S. Green, said that all the vehicles which had been granted at Harwich, Hull and Felixstowe were now taken up but another four granted at Grimsby were not on the road yet. Seven vehicles at Preston would go back to their previous base if the application was granted.

Two customer witnesses were called in support of the application. Mr. G. R. Carter, assistant distribution manager of ICI (Fibres) Ltd., said that if the Ferrymasters ICI traffic in 1967 was taken as an index of 100 the 1968 figure was 190 and the 1969 was 220. Mr. P. Sorsby of Tinsley Wire Industries Ltd., Sheffield, said his North West traffic had grown 25 per cent in the last year and at least four Ferrymasters' containers worked for him every week.

The first of the objectors, Mr. P. S. Cross of Link Line Ltd., Liverpool, said that his company had lost traffic to Ferrymasters. In order to compete, Mr. Cross said, he would need to make a substantial reduction in rate. He produced figures of availability.

Mr. E. M. Hains, director of the applicant company, said that a haulier with such a number of vehicles idle could not quote a competitive rate. Mr. Cross replied that this fleet position was not general.

The managing director of the Liverpool and Preston depots of Ulster Ferry Transport Ltd., Mr. E. Theaker, said his company had lost traffic to Ferrymasters. In May 1968 they had earned £6,767 from Heinz Ltd. while in May 1969 it was only £2,343.

Mr. 12; G. Davis, managing director of Containerway and Roadferry Ltd., said that the growth rate of traffic with Ireland was becoming static. It would be about four years. he thought, before there would be much more growth. The arrival of Ferrymasters had meant traific being extracted from existing hauliers.

Summing up, Mr. Lawton, counsel for one of the objectors, said in his view the sole concern of Ferrymasters was to "carve themselves a corner of Irish traffic." It had set up a substantial haulage operation in Preston by bringing vehicles from another area. These were not grounds for a grant.

Mr. Backhouse, counsel for seven objectors, said the application as entered was misleading and technically incorrect. The purpose of the application was to add seven vehicles at Felixstowe without justifying them. Ferrymasters must not be allowed to get away with this, said Mr. Backhouse. In addition, no evidence of need had been established.