AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Maintenance Vehicle Refused N O evidence had been produced to show

12th October 1962
Page 9
Page 9, 12th October 1962 — Maintenance Vehicle Refused N O evidence had been produced to show
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords :

that the procedure for obtaining temporary substitution of a vehicle under Section 14 of the Road Traffic Act was unsatisfactory, Stated Mr. J. H. E. Randolph, the Deputy Yorkshire Licensing Authority when he refused an application by J. Wright and Sons, Ltd., for a maintenance vehicle, at Sheffield on .Tuesday. Details should also have been produced regarding the length of time the various units have been off the road.

Mr. G. Wright, a director of J. Wright and Sons, stated that he wanted an A licence for one vehicle of 4 tons to be used solely for maintenance purposes. At present their fleet of 31 vehicles was overworked and if a unit needed repairing it could not be withdrawn from the road immediately or else consignments would be delayed. They had availed themselves of Section 14 about six times during the past year, but sometimes this was not practicable.

Tags

People: G. Wright, Randolph
Locations: Sheffield

comments powered by Disqus