1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178 
clay probably won't need a sheet;a load of dry sand
Page 52
Page 53
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
probably will.The problem for operators is that any complaint will he legally judged on its individual merits. So a firm with an automatic sheeting system that can demonstrate the driver has been briefed on the risks and trained in safe sheeting will be on much stronger legal ground in the event of a problem. It's not enough to simply ensure drivers are trained; you also need a paper trail to prove it.
What happens if the driver isn't the loader'?Then this should be a part of the risk assessment, with adequate training and equipment for loaders. How about a curtainsider? Technically the curtain isn't a restraint but weatherproofing. So c urtai nsiders, especially when used for diminishing loads, should have restraint systems in addition to the curtains, says Biddle.
Load security needs to start at the vehicle specification stage.There's no point having strong restraints with weak securing points or flimsy bulkheads what works for insulating foam won't hold back steel. Operators should be wary of sites such as quarries where movement restrictions on the driver isolate him from toad processing. and where he can't make a safe physical check.
Drivers need specific training in every task. Both employer and driver are to some degree responsible for a lost load. If the driver has had no instruction on securing methods, the burden of responsibility is likely to switch to his employer who mustn't assume knowledge on the part of staff.
Some companies. including Frai ken, have specific board members accountable for health and safetya sobering thought in the light of the long-awaited tightening of corporate manslaughter laws and their enforcement.
Conclusion
Blessed are those who have risk-assessed, specified, trainee-monitored, bought the best quality load restraints and, above all, carefully recorded this process as a potential defence in the event of an accident and prosecution. Likely damned in court are those who don't. •