1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
Fruit fine
11th October 1980, Page 20
11th October 1980
Page 20
Page 20, 11th October 1980
— Fruit fine
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
FOLLOWING a routine check Tankhill Road, Purfleet, EssE an operator has been fined £1 and the driver of the vehicle £E
On May 7, the vehicle longed to Newma Fruit Farr Ltd, of Paddock Wood, Kent, E ceeded its permitted second mi weight by 7.7 per cent. Its driv( Michael Deppe, assisted checking the load before settir off and was satisfied with ti vehicle's legality.
A solicitor's letter to Gra Magistrates Court on behalf the company said that Newn takes practical steps when loa ing its vehicles. It was said th the company could not afford weighbridge at its depot and had to rely on arithmetic checks when loading.