AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

ns Vehicles in R.4 : Mostly Small Lots L IST R.4,

10th September 1954
Page 35
Page 35, 10th September 1954 — ns Vehicles in R.4 : Mostly Small Lots L IST R.4,
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

published on Wednesday by the British Transport Commission, ;:ornprises 151 units and 928 vehicles. Units without premises number 126 (474 vehicles) and those with property, 25 454 vehicles).

Tenders have to be submitted by October 13, or if land and buildings are included, by October 27.

' The units have been offered in earlier lists, but were unsold. Fifty-eight of them are compounded from units previously up for sale. There.are nine parcels units and three engaged on'contract hire. One of the contract units comprises 28 vehicles at 260 Cambridge Heath Road, London, E.2.

Most of the lots consist of not more than five vehicles, although a notable exception is unit 628 at Swanley Village, Kent, which comprises 40 vehicles and four trailers, plus additional vehicles , and trailers, and property. Two of the vehicles are six-wheelers and six are eight-wheelers. Other large units areat Howgate, Whitehaven .(28 vehicles); Bradford (23); and Darley 'Dale, Matlock (25).

The breakdown of units by divisions is: South-eastern 15; Scottish 23; Northwestern 25; North-eastern 20; Midland 18;'South-western 27; • Western 9; Eastern 13; and Special Traffics I.

MORE SPECIAL A LICENCES IN NORTH • THE Northern Licensing Authority

announced on Tuesday that he had granted special A licences to the following:—

HULL GRANTED CONSENT TNthe face of opposition from Haltemprice Urban District Council, within whose boundary the extension lies, Hull Transport Department was on Monday ,granted consent by the Yorkshire Licensing Authority to operate from the city boundary to Priory Road camn, .a .distance of 700 yd.

The council's ground for objection was that the service should be operated by East Yorkshire' MotorServices„Ltd. They were not, howeVer,-cnitiose.d -'. to .2. its being run by the corporation -under the: Co-ordination _agreement,And 'provi4-ed that it was onlywhile the 'camp

exiSteti. •