1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148 
No Further Action By Mr. Hanlon
Page 49
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
NO further action was taken by Mr. J. A. T. Hanlon, Northern Licensing Authority, at the resumed hearing of an inquiry, held at the request of Ditchburns, Ltd., Sunderland, parent company of a group of furniture manufacturers, at Newcastle upon Tyne, last week. They wanted td give reasons' why their C licence for 35 vehicles should not be revoked or suspended. At the previous hearing (The Commercial Motor, February 26) Mr. Hanlon said that it had come. to his notice that they and one of their subsidiaries, Leeds Cabinet Co. Ltd., had been fined £200 on 89 charges of contravening the 1930 and 1933; Acts, at • Leeds. The offences concerned the keeping of records and drivers' hours. Six prohibition notices had also been issued against the company and its subsidiaries. This week, Mr. Hanlon, who Said that he had received reports from his certifying and maintenance officer -and a vehicle examiner, which stated that matters were proceeding satisfactorily, decided that there was nothing more to be said about the case.