1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198 
The lowdown The Axor was either going to be the
10th February 2005, Page 75
10th February 2005
Page 75
Page 75, 10th February 2005
— The lowdown The Axor was either going to be the
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
best of both worlds, or of neither. Fortunately for DaimlerChrysler's UK ambitions it falls more into the former camp. Its productivity and performance are up there with the best of the sector, while its fleet-biased specification proves that simple doesn't have to mean spartan.
With a genuine identity of its own, the Axor knows where it's going, and in doing so leaves the way clear for the Actros to go its own.more glamorous way too.
It's not often that we reach the end of a test and suggest you don't buy the s ubject, but in this case we will. Don't buy anAxor 1840 — buy an Axor 1843 instead, and cheat the residual value system. Good value even if you lease it. So what's your excuse?