AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Removal Vans Appeal is Refused

9th March 1962, Page 50
9th March 1962
Page 50
Page 50, 9th March 1962 — Removal Vans Appeal is Refused
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

AN appeal by a Haywards Heath removals contractor was refused by the Transport Tribunal in London last week. The appeal, by McCalls Removals, Ltd., was against a decision of the South Eastern Licensing Authority, refusing to grant them an A licence for two removal vans.

Giving the Tribunal's decision, the president, Sir. Hubert Hull, said that McCalls proposed to carry mainly furniture and household effects for any distance. They desired, in effect, to go into the furniture removals business as hauliers.

The application, said Sir Hubert, attracted a considerable number of objectors, some from Haywards Heath and some from as far away as Brighton.

The most unusual feature of the case was that a furniture removal firm carrying on business at Lewes which had been executing about 70 per cent. of the work which the applicants had to get done, appeared in support of the application, saying they would be glad to be relieved of part of the work they had been doing as sub-contractors for the applicants.

Despite the fact that the Tribunal sympathized with Mr. McCall they were unable to find in the evidence anything to suggest that the grant of a licence would be in the interests of the persons supplying the transport or the persons requiring it.

"So far as appears from the evidence, everybody who has wanted furniture removed has had it done and. has not suffered any inconvenience or loss, or damage from the fact that Mr. McCall has had to have it done by people who were not his employees," said Sir Hubert.


comments powered by Disqus