AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Six out of 11 allegations dropped

9th June 1994, Page 18
9th June 1994
Page 18
Page 18, 9th June 1994 — Six out of 11 allegations dropped
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Offences involving two Special Types vehicles cost Carrington, Manchester-based J Wright (Heavy Haulage) £1,065 in fines and costs.

The company originally faced 11 alleged offences before Wigan magistrates: one for using a vehicle with a defective tachograph; two of using vehicles without an 0-licence and three of using untested vehicles. Also alleged were two offences of failing to display a test certificate, failing to display a plate on a trailer, one of failing to display a ministry. plate and one of failing to have a two yearly check on a tachograph.

Following discussions with the defence, the prosecution abandoned six of the allegations_ Jonathan Lawton, defending, said the defective tachograph charge arose because it was recording 201cm/h below the base line—a simple malfunction of the tachograph_ Two offences of unauthorised use arose because the vehicles were on the licence held by a related company and were being transferred.

The failure to have a two year tachograph check was an administrative error, said Lawton.

As far as the offence of using an untested vehicle was concerned, the vehicle had run out of test only a day or two beforehand.

The magistrates fined the company 1300 for each offence of unauthorised use, £160 for using a vehicle with a defective tachograph, £160 for using an untested vehicle, £120 for not having a two yearly tachograph check and £25 prosecution costs,

Tags

People: Lawton
Locations: Manchester

comments powered by Disqus