AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

New Act for Vlunicipal Transport ?

9th January 1953, Page 45
9th January 1953
Page 45
Page 45, 9th January 1953 — New Act for Vlunicipal Transport ?
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

ANEW Act to consolidate and unify the operation of municipal passenger transport, was suggested by Mr. W. J. Evans, general manager of Reading Transport Department, at a meeting of the Metropolitan Section of the Institute of Transport, in London, on Monday.

Considerable sections of the 1930 Act could be incorporated in it, he said, but clarity and uniformity would be required on certain specific matters. There should be properly constituted control by elected representatives of the burgesses and the transport undertaking should be self-supporting, and not a liability to the general rate fund.

Plough Back Profits Profits should be ploughed back into the department to improve services and reduce fares. The basic principles ort fares structure and concession fares should be settled at national level. The Licensing Authority should function on co-ordinated services and Nhere a maximum fare had to be exceeded.

The several methods of contributing to central administration or Town Hall expenses, including rating, ought to be defined and settled as fair payment for services rendered. Scopefor running stage, express and contract services should be the same for all operators. and company, nationalized and municipal undertakings ought to be treated

If such an Act reached the Statute Book, a common denominator would be provided for municipal /transport, and. said Mr. Evans, it was certain that a number of the parochial difficulties which were delaying co-ordination between local authorities, would be eliminated.

Speaking on co-ordination, he said that if the bargaining powers on both sides had been more equal, much more could have been done. The municipal operator had said, "Thou shalt not came in," and the company operator had said. "We are not letting you come out." The user of transport suffered.

In consequence. both parties were inclined to run skeleton, uneconomic services just as a face-saving gesture and by way of staking a claim to possible future development. In cases known to Mr. Evans, better and more frequent services, which might even have shown

a margin of profit, would have resulted from a joint running agreement.

So far as municipal transport was concerned, the restrictions of the 1870 and 1930 Acts, with the more recent swinging of national policies from the Transport Act, 1947 to the present Transport Bill, required a complete investigation so that that branch of the industry could plan for the future with security and equity.

Unrest Created The 1947 Act, Mr. Evans said, started a period of unrest and uncertainty throughout the transport industry. The political pendulum was always liable to swing, but, he suggested, the three major sections of the passenger transport industry—the private operator, the nationalized group, and municipal transport—should now be given an equal chance to assist in stabilizing the economic forces with which they were now confronted.

Political theories might affect the privately and state-owned systems, but it was considered that municipal transport would remain virtually under local control, and if given normal scope, the 70-80 undertakings would provide a useful yardstick on matters of cost and service to the

Tags

People: W. J. Evans
Locations: London

comments powered by Disqus