AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

RID branded 'esoteric' in landmark case

9th February 2006
Page 6
Page 6, 9th February 2006 — RID branded 'esoteric' in landmark case
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE FIRST LEGAL challenge to the Road Transport Directive (RTD) has ended in success for a driver who won more than £1.000 at an Employment Tribunal.

The Manchester Tribunal branded the RTD legislation "complex and rather esoteric'', Hatton Logistics in Wiltshire was ordered to pay the driver £883.80 with £200 compensation after he refused to work when Ii legal hours had expired.

The company, which does not recognise any unions, had imposed a deal with a reference period of 52 weeks. The driver is a member of the United RoadTransport Union ( URT(J) which argued on his behalf that not only was this illegal, but that the contract was produced without involving any elected representatives of the employees.

TheTribunal's chairman said: "It isn't suggested that the respondent was guilty of had faith, taking such advice as it could at the time and labouring with a general, if not national, misunderstanding as to what the regulations meant and how they would work in effect."

A spokeswoman for the company says: "At no time did we try not to adhere to the law.

uRru regional officer Brian Hart says:"I praise the member for having the conviction to stand by his belief even when his employer was refusing to pay him."

• URTU General Secretary Bob Monks has fought off a challenge from previous incumbent David Higginbottom. christopher.tindall@rbi.co.ok


comments powered by Disqus