AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Summary Justice

9th April 1954, Page 34
9th April 1954
Page 34
Page 34, 9th April 1954 — Summary Justice
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

EVER a :vigorous man of action, the Yorkshire Licensing. Authority, has taken i bold step to deal with farmers whose interpretation of their powers to carry for hire or reward under C licences is too liberal He has thus achieved in a stroke . something that 'several years '.: negotiation between the Rod Haulage Association, and the National Farmers' Union has failed to profitice-La: definition.of the area. in 'whichjarmers 'may be said to be neighbours. ' ' • Under Section1 (5) (c) of the Road and Rail Traffic Act, 1933, a charge may be made under a C licence for "the carriage by a person engaged in agriculture in any locality Of goods for or in connection with the business of agriculture carried on by another person: in that locality, so long as the goods are carried in a vehicle which the person carrying them is authorized by a licence to use for the carriage of goods for or in connection with his agricultural busine0?! ' • • No definition ' Of .a--" locality" has ever been given by .the',cOuris and the Yorkshire Licensing Ant hOrity"Wasii(her COUrageous of rash -when, last week; he warned .a farmer that if he Carried for hire or reward for a neighbour outside a radius of five miles from his homestead, he would be prosecuted.

The operator had not been called before the Authority to account for. his conduct, but the matter -.arose during an application for a variation of a B licence. The variation was refused and the applicant was granted a short-term B licence, with the warning that he would have to comply strictly with its conditions and restrict his C-licence work.

The Authority was, in effect, attaching a condition to the C licence and his action could be challenged in the courts. It will, however, be welcomed by all bona fide hauliers. They have complained for many years of the unfair -co-inpetition of farmers who, as in • the case of the Yorkshire operator, have been carrying for .hire or reward for other farmers based as far as 20 miles distant from their holdings. .

It is to be hoped that the Licensing Authority has encouraged the Minister of Transport to amend the 1933 Act to lay down a specific limit to the activities of the farmers.


comments powered by Disqus