AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

SPLITTING REST PERIOC

7th December 2000
Page 27
Page 27, 7th December 2000 — SPLITTING REST PERIOC
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• I am having a dispute another driver about i rest when part is taken ferry. We know that it daily rest is broken, part being taken on ferry and part on Ian has to be increased by hours. I say the two Ft can be added to a daily reduced to nine Ix making 11 hours in total my mate says It has t added to the basic rest hours, making a total hours. Who is right?

• Article 9 of EC Rego 3280/85, which allows this I in daily rest, states that wh driver accompanies a goo passenger vehicle which il led by ferry or train the rest period may be intern once on condition that:

• The part of the rest p taken on land is taken befc after that part taken on thE or train; • The period between tit parts is as short as possibl does not exceed one before embarkation or afti embarkation (Customs fo ties being included in embarkation or disembarl operation): • During both parts of thi period the driver has am a bunk or couchette: • A daily rest period ruoted in this way is incn by two hours.

A court might take thf that a driver whose daily I disturbed by driving On or ferry needs more rest—nc The court could take no Article 8 (1), which allows daily rest to be taken in 1 three periods as long as it reduced daily rest and increased by one hour. C ance, I would favour the vie the daily rest period in the cumstances should be 13 I

Tags

Organisations: UN Court

comments powered by Disqus