AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Bid for Reduction of L.M.S. Licences A REQUEST for the

7th August 1936, Page 26
7th August 1936
Page 26
Page 26, 7th August 1936 — Bid for Reduction of L.M.S. Licences A REQUEST for the
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Business / Finance

removal from CA its licences of three vehicles run by the L.M.S. Railway Co. was made by Mr. V. R. Shepherd, for road objectors, at a Chester sitting of the Northwestern *Deputy Licensing Authority, last week. The company applied for four vehicles (17 tons) and a trailer (14 On) at its Chester base.

It was stated that the company originally applied for and was granted A licences for 13 vehicles and three trailers. The present application was brought forward on the ground of an expansion in collection and delivery work through increased rail-borne traffic. A railway witness declared that in July, 1934, the L.M.S. had brought a vehicle from Burnley. In February, 1935, it transferred another vehicle from Manchester, and in December last a further machine was drawn from the Wolverhampton base. These vehicles had been permanently stationed at Chester ever since.

Mr. Shepherd suggested that these. three vehicles had been illegally worked and that the Authority should consider exercising his powers under Section 10 by deleting the vehicles from the company's Burnley and Manchester licences, on the ground that the applicant had permanently operated these machines from their present base at Chester. since their removal. He also suggested that representations should be made to the West Midland Authority to amend the Wolverhampton licence.

Mr. P. Kershaw, for the L.M.S., said that he would like an opportunity of replying later to the proposal.

Sir William Hart said that he would consider the matter. The hearing was adjourned.


comments powered by Disqus