1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192 
PENALTIES
6th September 2007, Page 35
6th September 2007
Page 35
Page 35, 6th September 2007
— PENALTIES
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• A convicted organisation faces an unlimited fine. The court will have new powers to order that specific steps are taken to remedy the breach. It can also make a publicity order requiring the organisation to publicise the fact that it has been convicted along with specified particulars.
• Although the initial impact felt by the organisation will be the imposition of the fine, should the court consider it appropriate to order a publicity order this could have a greater prolonged effect with operators facing a loss of business in the future.
• Further, any conviction will require reporting to the Traffic Commissioner — potentially resulting in the commencement of a public inquiry where action could be taken against the firm's 0-licence.
Tags
Organisations:
UN Court