AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Taxman will blitz take-home drivers

6th June 1991, Page 6
6th June 1991
Page 6
Page 6, 6th June 1991 — Taxman will blitz take-home drivers
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• The Inland Revenue is clamping down on van drivers who use their firm's vehicles for private use, particularly those who earn more than £8,500 a year.

The private use problem was highlighted when the amount of tax paid by van drivers at AEG (UK), based at Wrexham, was raised from £100 to £550.

"Employers should have a reasonable idea of the extent of private use based on fact," says Leslie Ferrar, a tax partner at accountancy firm KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock.

"If there is private use, it should be declared on P11D tax forms," she adds.

When preparing a case against increasing the tax on private use, a company can argue that an employee has to take his van home because he needs it for a visit to a customer first thing the next morning. It could also point Out that the practice improves vehicle security, particularly when tools are kept on board and there is a lack of secure parking at work.

In addition, employers can write to employees pointing out that vehicles are not for private use.

There has been no change in the law; the Inland Revenue is simply taking a harder line, says Ferrar.

By law an employee using a firm's vehicle for private mileage can be taxed on 20% of its value.

An Inland Revenue spokeswoman says: "We are making sure that people know what they should be declaring.

"I shouldn't think there is much private use associated with heavy lorries," she adds.

Tags

People: Leslie Ferrar

comments powered by Disqus