1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196 
Lack of written terms nets driver extra compensation
Page 13
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A WALSALL TRUCK driver has had his compensation for unpaid holiday pay unexpectedly doubled because of a change in Employment Tribunal regulations.
A Birmingham Employment Tribunal had already awarded Driver David Hewitt a total of £548 in unpaid holiday money against his former employer, driver agency A StC Recruitment of Wa lsa The Tribunal had not been legally bound to take into consideration the fact that Hewitt had not been given written terms and conditions of employment.
But because of a recent change in Tri burial regulations concerning contracts. Hewitt, who had been employed by the firm for nearly a year, asked for his compensation to be reviewed.
At the latest hearing, Tribunal chairman Peter Swann awarded Hewitt a further £548 because of the firm's failure to provide him with written terms and conditions.
Swami said: "The firm has been brought hack through no fault of its own because there was no mandatory procedure regarding written terms for contracts at the time of the previous hearing.
"The case has been reviewed in the interests of j ustice."