AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

R.H.A. Back Jacks Motors in Second Appeal

6th July 1962, Page 36
6th July 1962
Page 36
Page 36, 6th July 1962 — R.H.A. Back Jacks Motors in Second Appeal
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE executive committee of the Road Haulage Association at a meeting last week decided to support Jacks Motors, Ltd., of Blackburn, in an appeal to Quarter Sessions. The company were originally found guilty by Blackburn Magistrates of failing to cause a correct driver's record to be kept. They appealed to the Divisional Court who ruled that if a driver went off on a " frolic " of his own, his employers could not be held responsible. The court remitted the case back to the justices to consider further whether the .driver was acting within the scope of his employment. At a second hearing, recently. the magistrates found that a considerable part of the journey undertaken by the driver was within the scope of his employment, and they decided to let their original conviction stand. It is against this second finding that a second appeal has been lodged.

Tags

Organisations: Divisional Court

comments powered by Disqus