AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Driver wins dismissal hearing

6th January 1994, Page 11
6th January 1994
Page 11
Page 11, 6th January 1994 — Driver wins dismissal hearing
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• FW Thorpe has been held to have acted unfairly in sum

marily dismissing a driver following a series of minor accidents.

A Birmingham Industrial Tribunal adjourned consideration of the amount of compensation to be awarded, after assessing that the driver concerned, Malcolm Davies, had contributed to his own dismissal by 25%.

The Tribunal was told that Davies had been sacked because the company had concluded he was careless.

It said that before his dismissal, Davies had not been given any valid warning about the way he drove his tuck. On 26 January he was involved in a further minor accident, and he was summarily dismissed after a disciplinary hearing on 1 Feb.

The Tribunal was of the opinion that a reasonable employer would not dismiss an employee for such conduct, without prior warning. However, it accepted that Davies' conduct had contributed to his dismissal.

Tags

People: Malcolm Davies

comments powered by Disqus