AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Appeal appeal

5th October 1995, Page 22
5th October 1995
Page 22
Page 22, 5th October 1995 — Appeal appeal
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Iwould like to hear from any drivers who, within the last two years, have been prosecuted or paid a fixed penalty fine for failing to comply with the traffic sign showing a height resn-iction at the Blackwall Tunnel southern approach, London. And who, as I was, were victims of the electronic overheight detector (which directs over-height vehicles to divert) being switched off at the time it was most required—in my case at 07:15hrs.

In the event I am refused an out-of-time appeal. I am currently preparing a case accusing the Traffic Division of the Metropolitan Police and the Superintendent of the Blackwall Tunnel of conspiring to act as agent provocateur to ensnare otherwise law-abiding commercial road users.

If I could be supplied with times and dates of similar incidents to give support to my appealkase it would, should I be successful, warrant a review of any prior or subsequent prosecutions that may have been brought about concerning this arranged 'offence'.

Please contact 0181-519 4387 (Answerphone) leaving your name and phone number and the most convenient time to call you back, and I will.

Jim Hollingsworth. London.

Tags

Locations: London

comments powered by Disqus