1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
SEVEN ON A FOR BULWARK
Page 46
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
BULWARK UNITED TRANSPORT Li LTD. has had six vehicles on shortterm licences since October 1961, and now thought it justifiable to apply for an open A licence for them as well as three others which had been on short-term since October 1963, This was stated by Mr. C. P. Crowe, representing the company at Manchester on Monday, When Mr. A. H, Jolliffe, the North Western deputy Licensing Authority granted the applications for seven tanker units on open A licence and two tanker units to be used for maintenance work, but refused to allow the two vehicles to be used on peak period work. Pickfords Ltd. were the only objectors.
Mr. Crowe said that John Ancliffe Ltd., of Urrnston, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Bulwark and looked after the northern area The company operated 12 tanker vehicles on open A licence and 52 tankers on Contract A for bulk liquid companies in the north.
His clients and B.R.S. Pickfords had always had a happy relationship, said Mr. Crowe, and it was traditional knowledge that B.R.S. and other tank operators had large increases with new vehicles in the last year. He submitted that AncIiffe's vehicles were working to full capacity, but unfortunately the firm did not have a maintenance vehicle, which left his clients unable to operate a successful service unit. "There is a shortage of bulk tankers not only in this area but everywhere." He was surprised that B.R.S. had persisted in their objection when they had two vehicles on application for the same purpose.