AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Trade groups condemn Manchester's jam plan

5th July 2007, Page 9
5th July 2007
Page 9
Page 9, 5th July 2007 — Trade groups condemn Manchester's jam plan
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

THE ROAD HAULAGE Association (RHA) is objecting to the proposed Transport Innovation Fund bid by the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA).

It warns that the Manchester proposal is fundamentally flawed because of the intention to impose a congestion charge on goods vehicle operators.

Geoff Dunning, northern regional director of the RHA, points out that the AGMA proposal -is totally dedicated to passenger transport.

"On the charging side they say nothing about freight, only that they will be charged more than cars.This is totally unacceptable.

"They have also said that operators can just change the time they deliver—that is totally naive."

The Freight Transport Association (FTA) has also spoken out against the bid, stressing that the initial draft said nothing about LGVs. Geoff Dossetter, director of external affairs at the FTA, says: "A scheme that reduces congestion [caused by private cars would be welcome, but freight is essential. If appropriate, it should be excluded from the charge."

The RHA's formal response to the plan highlights, among many other issues, that the AGMA report fails to reflect the contribution that trucks make to the economy of Greater Manchester and that the charge will have a direct negative impact on freight deliveries both inside and outside the charging area.

The proposal will be open to public consultation until July.

Nick Cole, principal transport policy officer for Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority, has previously stated: "It is key that we hear from industry because we want to limit the impact on freight and make sure the charge works for them too."


comments powered by Disqus