AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

GO sub pursued for diesel cash

4th March 1999, Page 10
4th March 1999
Page 10
Page 10, 4th March 1999 — GO sub pursued for diesel cash
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A subcontractor who was working for GB Express SA when it went to the wall is still being pursued by the receiver for an unpaid diesel bill, despite being owed more than £48,000 by the former international haulier. Martin Heath from Lichfield-based M-TEC refused to pay the bill in December, almost a year after GB Express went into receivership.

He says he has given up hope of seeing his money which almost cost him his business, and knows of several others who have suffered severe losses. "It's disgusting that the British Government can allow this to happen," Heath adds.

"There should be something to protect the small haulier, I've only just started to get the business into a positive position again," he says.

M-TEC used to work for GB Express SA, which appointed a receiver in Bordeaux.

Commercial Motor has also heard from another subcontractor who tried for months to get information about payment but ultimately failed, with the loss of thousands of pounds.

Tags

Organisations: British Government
People: Martin Heath
Locations: Lichfield

comments powered by Disqus