1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154 
9gowtauce 6n the we
Page 51
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
I have noticed with interest your comments under Question and Answers of February 11 and the problems of the one-man haulier setting up on his own are fully appreciated in relation to the obtaining of adequate insurance, It would appear, however, that CM comments are a little misleading as it is not true to say that all Goods in Transit Policies specify goods for which the Insurer will not pay if they are lost.
For well established, well run firms there are a number of policies available which do not specify excluded goods of any category nor do they impose any warranties upon the haulier with regard to overnight garaging or immobilising of vehicles.
This has been a recent market development and meets a very obvious need for flexible insurance cover but is, of course, available only to firms who can show a period of responsible management. M. W. DAVIES, Director, Stewart Wrightson (South Eastern) Ltd, Medway House, Maidstone, • Kent.