1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152 
Opposition to RHA reorganization
Page 48
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
THERE are growing signs that the report of the RHA study group on co-operation may not receive such an untroubled adoption as its authors had fondly anticipated. The national council decision to send it back to areas and functional groups inevitably means considerable delay, but—more important it lessens the chances of unanimous approval of the document.
It is understood that the livestock group is piqued (to say the least) at the arbitrary recommendation of the report to the effect that the group should be amalgamated with the agricultural hauliers. In the view of the livestock operators this sweeping conclusion shows scant regard for, or knowledge of, the particular conditions applicable to that class of haulage.
There are also some murmurings in the areas. And obviously there will be searching questions on the report's suggestions concerning administration. From the functional group standpoint, careful thought will be given to the proposed restriction of meetings to a committee of 15.